By Jack Jodell, Jan. 4, 2012

Dark horse Rick Santorum apparently came within a mere 11 votes of eking-out an upset victory over Mitt Romney last night in Iowa.  This was but a minor and temporary  aberation, however, because Santorum simply does not have anywhere near the money he needs to successfully challenge Romney on a national level. For, our corporatist, overly-conservative Supreme Court, as a direct result of their disastrous and wholly ill-founded Ciyizens United ruling of 2010, has opened the literal floodgates for a whole host of corporate money and secret multimillionaire donations to pollute our political campaigns  for next November’s election, and Romney’s supporters have already amassed a very potent SuperPAC. The court’s blatantly pro-special interest decision guarantees that we, the electorate, will be virtually bombarded with constant, nonstop lying TV, radio, and print ads all the way through November 5. We have already seen a preview of what will be in store from the weeks which led up to yesterday’s Iowa Republican caucuses. Mitt Romney’s secret SuperPAC all but destroyed rival Newt Gingrich with negative ads in that state, and all the candidates together spent well over $3 MILLION to do so. That was just for a political caucus in one small state, IOWA, and not even for a full-fledged primary election! Meanwhile, Romney’s actual campaign portrayed him in other paid-for ads as a gentle, patriotic, optimistic can-do kind of candidate who should be elected President. To be expected, NOWHERE was it mentioned that he himself grew wealthy in large part due to the way he helped Bain Capital put many Americans out of work by exporting their jobs overseas, or that he had laid many workers off to make the companies Bain devoured appear more profitable. The infuriatingly sad fact is that neither Romney, nor (obviously) the conservative Supreme Court justices, nor ANY of the other far-right Republican candidates see anything at all wrong with pouring millions and billions into defeating their hated Barack Obama, even at a time where millions of Americans remain unemployed and growing numbers face foreclosure or homelessness! The end justifies their means, and they will spend ANY amount to replace the President, so long as their ends are met. That these millions and billions can and should be spent to employ those out of work doesn’t even cross their minds, because they simply DON’T CARE!

So get ready for an ever-increasing barrage of negative, less-than-factual political attack ads, my friends. By summer and autumn, these will rise to a fever pitch. This will be especially true this year, because wealthy, conservative business types like the disgusting, greed-driven Koch brothers and most other members and supporters of the wealthiest 1% of the country absolutely HATE the President and want to see him driven from office. Karl Rove‘s dirty PAC will also be working feverishly to elect a Republican President. Being constantly lied to in the corporatist mainstream media, is it any wonder that so many Americans detest politics as they do and are so livid with our elected officials? It is so surprising that many end up as disgusted, biased, low-information voters who will actually be tricked by the 1% into voting against their own best interests – the common, shared interests of the 99% of the rest of us who are in the absolute MAJORITY?  It is no mystery to me, nor should it be to any of you. We are being deliberately and malevolently duped! 

Thankfully, though, we have some very good resources we can use to ensure we do NOT fall prey to bullshit planted by the 1% in our emails, newspapers, magazines, and TV and radio stations we watch and listen to. These sources are listed below. ANYTIME you hear ANY candidate claim, or political ad, GO TO THESE SOURCES AND CHECK IT OUT! THEN, and ONLY THEN, will you truly be an INTELLIGENT and INFORMED voter, not a deluded fool who is taken advantage of by these unscrupulous LIARS! 

First off, try going to a very revealing site called ( Here you will always find a wide array of candidates’ claims and charges, as well as those by members of Congress, and these are rated on their TRUTH-O-METER as to how truthful or lying they are, and WHY they are true or false. This site was created, and is maintained by, The St. Petersburg Times. You will very soon find this to be a most valuable resource in maintaining political sanity in a world of preposterousness!

You can also check out,
a wonderfully non-partisan and fact-driven nonprofit site begun and operated by the Annenberg Foundation. They monitor the accuracy of candidates’ speeches, media ads, debates, interviews, and news releases, acting as a sort of consumer advocate for voters. You can find them at  

Open is yet another great resource, in that it traces where each candidate’s financial backing came from. Found at, this fabulous site reveals exactly how much of each elected official’s or aspirant’s campaign donations came from individual contributions, PACs, party and congressional committees, industries (and industry types), unions, or other groups.You will soon be able to ascertain exactly who has been supporting (or buying off) YOUR particular Representative, Senator, or presidential candidate!

To determine where your particular Presidential, Senate, or Representative candidate stands on a wide array of issues, you can find it all listed at On The ( 

For finding the truth on suspected internet scams (political or otherwise), viral email hoaxes, and dishonest charity scams, there is no better verification source than ( Protect yourself from tomfoolery by using this site whenever you think you smell a rat. has long been recognized as a reliable debunker of email falsehoods (again, both political or not). This site will give you the full background on a topic and will then tell you why and how it is true or false. It can be found at

Last, but definitely not least, is, where you can “get the truth about rumors, inspirational stories, virus warnings, hoaxes, scams, humorous tales, pleas for help, urban legends, calls to action, and other forwarded emails.” It can be found at

ALL political campaigns fudge the facts, to be sure. No party or candidate tells the truth all the time, nor do they lie all the time. But for some reason, the most grievous falsehoods I have encountered seem to be found most often in emails written by ignorant, paranoid, far-right types. They and their followers just seem to blindly pass their bullshit around, urging others to do so as well, polluting the entire internet with their twisted stupidity in the process. Often, they preface their oft-misspelled nonsense with fictional claims like”Snopes says it’s true” when in fact said nothing of the sort. RULE NO. 1: IF IT SOUNDS TOO GOOD OR TOO BAD TO BE TRUE, 9 TIMES OUT OF 10 IT WON’T BE TRUE. Keep that in mind next time you get one of those crazy, way-out seeming emails, or when you view or listen to a political claim. There are millions of misguided and unsavory characters out there, so just make sure YOU never fall for one of their lies or distortions!



About jackjodell53

I am an American Dissident trapped in a country where poor and middle class people are constantly being exploited and lied to by a very rigid and conservative plutocratic elite. I believe in government OF, FOR, and BY the people, not one controlled as it now is by corporations and special interests.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Well said, with an excellent point about how much Romney spent on caucuses that rarely have anything to do with the final outcome of the GOP presidential nominee selection, much less winning the White House. How ironic that Santorum, who didn’t have anywhere near that much to spend, used hard work to beat Romney, albeit by a paltry four votes.

    Your information sources are helpful, with the exception of Politifact. After that site selected Democrats’ charge that Paul Ryan’s plan would’ve privatized and destroyed Medicare as we know it as “The Lie of the Year,” I no longer afford Politifact any credibility.

    • jackjodell53 says:

      Thanks, S.W.
      When I went to bed, Santorum led by 34 votes, with 99% of the vote in. When I got up this morning, it turns out that last 1% (THE 1%? LOL) had apparently provided ROMNEY with the necessary votes for victory. So I immediately edited this post for the final time.

      Regarding PolitiFact, I, too, was dismayed by the Ryan thing. But as you’ll note, I didn’t list them as the sole source for verification, and, having observed them over the past few years on virtually thousands of topics, I still regard them as viable, and will allow for one case of fallibility out of thousands. But that proves that we shouldn’t allow only one source of information to shape our opinions. I would urge all discerning voters to examine numerous sources von controversial issues before making up their mind, because any one of them can be mistaken at any time.

      • You’re right, of course, about the value of checking more than one source. What got me about Politifact’s outrageous gaffe was that, when presented with solid facts to the contrary, the guy in charge blew the facts off, claimed all the criticism was a partisan witch hunt and dug in his heels. Like, how dare anyone question his choice? That attitude doesn’t fit with fairness and devotion to truth, IMO.

  2. Darlene says:

    Thank you, Jack, for the information on where to get the facts. I will publish a few of them on my blog and am bookmarking this one for reference.

    It’s going to get really nasty out there. Faux News will be salivating at the garbage they will be able to spew.

    • jackjodell53 says:

      Thanks, Darlene. You’re right about the nastiness, and Faux won’t only be salivating, but they will be reaping record profits, too, from all the knuckleheads who will be buying air time to spew forth their crazy lying ads!

  3. mudrake says:

    Jack- it will be very interesting for us to watch the next GOP debate [January 7, 2012, 9pm ET on ABC] because The Newt will reign brimstone down on Romney for the barrage of negative ads his PAC ran against Newt. I’m betting that Newt repeats Romney’s PAC several times during the debate to inform the public to watch out for them.

    This will be very helpful to Obama as the year moves along. Nothing like a cat fight to help clear the air just a bit. Give ’em hell, Newt!

  4. jackjodell53 says:

    To S.W.,
    Hopefully, PolitiFact gave that guy a belated but much deserved “pants on fire” rating internally, and sent him packing!

    • I don’t think so, Jack. He’s the head of it.

      • jackjodell53 says:

        Owww—that’s nasty. Still, I consider it to be a worthwhile source, as that is the only grievous error I have caught them in so far. But I will keep a keen eye on them and compare their findings against others for sure. Thanks, S.W.!

  5. Tom Harper says:

    Thanks for the links. There were several sites I hadn’t heard of. We all need to be armed with all the fact-checking we can get.

  6. Hi Jack, great article. Nice job.

  7. jackjodell53 says:

    Thanks, Marc. The important thing for all to remember is that claims made by parties or candidates can and should be checked for accuracy using a number of sources before they can be accepted as fact.

  8. JollyRoger says:

    Watch Politi”fact” carefully. They used some pretty creative reasoning to excuse some of Czar Kashitch I’s more outrageous claims as regarded Ohio SB5.

    • jackjodell53 says:

      Jolly Roger,
      Very true, and their stance on Paul Ryan’s “plan” was pretty suspect too. That’s why I recommend everyone using more than one source for verification.

  9. osori says:

    Hi Jack, nice talking to you today, as always. here’s a couple links to what we discussed. First one is the young lady on a bicycle :

    second is the entire march, with 41:53 when OPD charged, and 53:28 the young woman interviewed:
    in solidarity, your friend

    • jackjodell53 says:

      Thank you, my friend, for sending me that video. The cops who threw that bicycle girl down WITHOUT ANY PROVOCATION ON HER PART deserved every bit of verbal abuse they got for acting like PIGS instead of policemen! They were bullies and outright cowards who deserve suspension for that action. I’m in solidarity with your struggles in Oakland, BIG TIME! There is NO EXCUSE for that kind of abuse!

  10. I used all of those sites during the last election. They are all pretty good, but Politifact has been slipping. They said that the statement “The Ryan Budget effectively ends Medicare as we know it” was the lie of the year. Well, The Ryan Budget does effectively end Medicare as we know it. It shifts the cost of it to seniors and changes the system. The fact that they won’t do it immediately is immaterial.

    Thanks for pointing out where to find real information.

    • jackjodell53 says:

      Thanks for stopping by, Motivated In Ohio. I agree they have been slipping, and that is why I’ve been encouraging everyone to use more than one source for their political verification. When it comes to knowledge, the more the better!

  11. Dave Dubya says:

    Politifact’s Lie of the Year just had to be a “fair and balanced” one against Dems for saying Republicans want to end Medicare. Right, if only they added “as we know it” it would have been ok.

    As if that compares to the great “Job Creators” propaganda from the Right.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s